Charles Peters Residence

The Charles Peters Residence is designated a Local Historic Place for being an example of the work of architect Harry H. Mott, for its aesthetic architectural value as a high-style building of quality materials and for its cultural value.

The Charles Peters Residence was designed as a single-family dwelling by architect Harry H. Mott of Saint John in 1899. Mott was the most prolific architect in Saint John at the turn of the 20th century. He began designing in the Second Empire Style and progressed to Queen Anne Revival and Romanesque Revival, with his style approaching modernism in its simplicity later in his career. This home is a good example of one of his larger private mid-career commissions. He often included Romanesque window treatments for his larger designs such as this residence and in the Main St. Baptist Church built in 1895. His style at the turn of the century combined the Queen Anne, Gothic Revival and Romanesque Revival styles in varying proportions.

The architectural value of this home also lies in its high quality materials and its sober expression of a modified Romanesque Revival style. It is an excellent example of a large, handsome private residence built at the turn of the 20th century in Saint John. The primary, street-facing façades are of heavy quarry-faced ashlars masonry laid in a Scotch bond. The massing of the house, with a semicircular bay window on one stone façade and an octagonal bay on the other, along with decorative gables on the brick façade, are typical of the Romanesque Revival style. The primary façades feature extensive undercut sandstone decoration featuring medieval foliate motifs which, along with the Romanesque arch and dwarfed columns of the entryway, also adhere to this style. The interior oak carving and panelling, staircase, fireplace surrounds, gas fittings, and Tiffany lamp also enhance the heritage value.

This home had two private owners, both families having considerable wealth based on commercial interests in the city. Oral tradition places the house as an engagement present in the case of both couples, although in both cases the acquisition of the house comes a few years after the wedding date. However, the opulent status of the home in both cases was important to the social status of the marriages.